Proposal to Address the Tarantino Incident: Community Engagement and Voting Introduction The purpose of this proposal is to engage the community in an open and transparent manner regarding the Tarantino incident. This matter has raised significant concerns and questions within our network, and it is essential to provide a platform for community members to express their opinions and make a collective decision. Background and Summary of Events The Tarantino incident involves a request by the Tor/Anon Group for a loan related to Tarantino, a matter to which I neither consented nor have had access to. The response from leadership has been disappointing, marked by a refusal to discuss the situation and alterations to related websites. The characterization of the loan as a "contribution" has further clouded the issue. For detailed evidence and a more complete understanding of the events, please refer to the screenshots. https://imgur.com/a/I7LKdhJ The Proposal I present this proposal with a realistic expectation that the vote may not pass. My experience with both leadership and the broader community has unfortunately been one of neglecting accountability. While I personally believe that the community's say in this matter may be limited, Guy has expressed a willingness to abide by the community's decision. Therefore, I propose the following 1. Conduct a community vote to determine the appropriate course of action regarding the Tarantino incident. 2. Voting "yes" will signify a collective decision to rectify the situation and uphold the principles of fairness and integrity. 3. Voting "no" or abstaining will indicate support for the actions and behavior exhibited by Tor and the leadership group, thus affirming this conduct as standard on Secret Network. My Position My intention has never been to harm the network, regardless of public perceptions that may have been wrongfully perpetuated. Acting on the advice of community members, legal professionals, and my agency, I have chosen to pursue this democratic route before taking further legal action. Voting yes on this proposal signals your support of Tor refunding the USD value of contributions for the Tarantino NFT. 100k USD from b00p3r. Voting "no" on this proposal signals endorsement of practices that I, and perhaps many others, find deeply troubling. Conclusion This proposal provides an opportunity for the community to express its stance on a critical and divisive issue. The choice to vote "yes" or "no" is not merely a decision about a specific incident; it reflects the values, ethics, and the standards Secret has instead of the ones it claims to have. I respectfully request your careful consideration of this proposal and your participation in the vote, and no matter the result I will continue to actively work to help community members solve issues on secret. b00p3r